4 Comments »

  1. Flickhead says; April 7, 2007 @ 8:40 pm

    I saw Double Agent 73 at a drive-in in Buffalo, New York, sometime between 1976 and 1978. It was on a triple bill with George Romero’s Jack’s Wife and Mario Bava’s Four Times That Night. You could say that was the grindhouse l’age d’or!

  2. Curt says; April 7, 2007 @ 9:31 pm

    I actually liked GRINDHOUSE a lot.

  3. Peter Nellhaus says; April 9, 2007 @ 12:51 am

    Kimberly: I have to be in awe of you when you write about a film I’ve never heard of, in this case Brother Charles. As for Grindhouse, I suspect the better reviews will come from those who’ve never even bothered to see a random DVD from Something Weird, or have any first hand familiarity with Tarantino’s frames of reference. My introduction to Chesty Morgan was when a photo of her topless was actually published in the NYU newspaper I wrote for, sometime around the release of the Wishman film.

  4. cinebeats says; April 9, 2007 @ 5:08 am

    Flickhead - What a great triple bill that must have been! I love Bava’s Four Times That Night and Double Agent 73 is fun stuff. I’ve never seen the Romero film you mentioned and now I’m curious about it.

    Curt - Glad you enjoyed Grindhouse. I’ve never been a fan of Rodriguez or Tarantino’s movies but obviously I’m in the minority. They’ve both got legions of fans and the critics really love them.

    Peter - I’m glad I could introduce you to Brother Charles. It’s a really unusual blaxploitation effort and I hope you’ll give it a look soon. I kind of got the impression from the reviews I’ve read that a lot of the Grindhouse critics hadn’t actually seen a lot of grindhouse movies. Just looking at the previews and reading about the movie makes it look and sound a lot more like an 80s summer blockbuster such as Terminator or one of the Mad Max movies, and the budget is similar. I’ve read that the budget for Grindhouse is more like 100 million when you start adding in the cost of publicity. That kind of money blows my mind. Can you imagine what someone like Doris Wishman or Roger Corman could have done with that kind of budget? I would have been more interested in seeing Grindhouse if the directors had made their movie for $100,000 with no name actors and shot it on old 8mm or 16mm film stock.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>





Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Movie Posters 1960-1979

see more in Cinebeats' Flickr Gallery










CREDITS

  • Cinebeats chronicles one woman's love affair with '60s & '70s era cinema. Or as she likes to call it, cinema's Platinum Age! Blog design, updates and all original content is provided by Kimberly Lindbergs. She can be reached by email at:
    kimberly@cinebeats.com. This site is a review site and claims no ownership over the images used to promote the films reviewed here. All original blog content is copyright © by Kimberly Lindbergs and can not be directly copied or distributed in full without her permission.