FEATURED POSTS

10 Questions with Shane Briant

The talented British' born actor Shane Briant made his screen debut in the Hammer horror film Demons of the Mind. Since then he's gone on to appear in over 60 films and television productions including Straight On Till Morning (1972), The Picture of Dorian Gray (1973), The Mackintosh Man (1973), Captain Kronos: Vampire Hunter (1974), Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell (1974), The Naked Civil Servant (1975) and Lady Chatterley's Lover (1981). Currently Briant is focusing his attention on writing fiction and he has recently completed a psychological thriller called Worst Nightmares that will be released May 12th. I've admired his film work for many years so I was thrilled to get the opportunity to ask Shane Briant a few questions about his early movies and current writing projects. READ MORE

THIS MONTH'S FEATURED POSTS

The Girl On a Motorcycle (1968)

The talented director and cinematographer Jack Cardiff has passed away at the age of 94. As the tributes start to roll out from various news sites and film blogs its become clear to me that most people regard Jack Cardiff as a great cinematographer and have little regard or knowledge of his directing contributions, which is a shame. Cardiff was a brilliant photographer and his groundbreaking contributions to cinematography are well worth celebrating. But his impressive work as a director on films like the wonderful D.H. Lawrence adaptation Sons and Lovers (1960), the entertaining spy thriller The Liquidator (1965), the excellent erotic drama The Girl on a Motorcycle (1968) and the effective horror film The Mutations (1974) is also worthy of applause. READ MORE

THIS MONTH'S FEATURED POSTS

Favorite DVD Releases of 2008

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but overall 2008 was somewhat of a lackluster year for new Region 1 DVD releases of '60s and '70s era films when compared to the previous two years (See: 2006 and 2007). Some of my favorite DVD companies such as BCI Eclipse and most recently New Yorker Films have folded. Boutique DVD companies are releasing fewer products and what is being released is often of questionable quality. With the failing economy and the rise in popularity of Blu-ray discs, it seems like the number of new worthwhile DVD releases might continue to drop dramatically in 2009. READ MORE

THIS MONTH'S FEATURED POSTS

Resurrecting Yusaku Matsuda

Toru Murakawa's Resurrection of the Golden Wolf (aka Yomigaeru kinrô; 1979) is a wildly uneven Japanese crime film that left me wishing it had been helmed by another director. The film's script was adapted from a popular novel by Haruhiko Ooyabu and directors like Seijun Suzuki have had great success turning Ooyabu's hard-boiled fiction into films, but Toru Murakawa doesn't have Suzuki's eye for detail or his pop art sensibility. Resurrection of the Golden Wolf runs much too long and the dramatic filler weighs down the action, but even with its flaws the movie still keeps your attention thanks to the star performance of Yusaku Matsuda. READ MORE

THIS MONTH'S FEATURED POSTS

We Are Controlling Transmission

This year analog broadcasting is coming to an end. On June 12th 2009 television stations in the United States will stop broadcasting in analog and switch permanently to digital. Digital broadcasting promises to provide viewers with a sharper picture and more diverse programming options, but this unavoidable change is forcing millions of people to buy new television sets or opt for getting a converter box that will often cost them $40 or more. I feel for these people because I didn't have complete cable TV Access or a digital television myself until 2007. READ MORE

9 Comments »

  1. Keith says; November 12, 2007 @ 9:21 pm

    Hey Kimberly. What a great blog. I haven’t seen this film since I was a kid. I loved it back then. Me and all my friends laughed so hard watching it. I’ll have to give it a shot now to see if I still enjoy it as an adult. It’s nice to see that you’re a fan of it as a child and adult. I do think this film has a timely message for us now as well as then. We can never let mass hysteria rule our lives. We’ve got to keep our wits and reason. There’s always a new boogeyman out there.

  2. cinebeats says; November 12, 2007 @ 11:24 pm

    Thanks for your enthusiastic comment Keith! I think you’d still find things to like about the movie if you saw it again. Reiner and Arkin are really good in it and I can watch John Philip Law in anything.

  3. Jonathan Lapper says; November 13, 2007 @ 6:04 am

    Alan Arkin has always been one of my favorite actors and I love him in this. He gave so many great performances in the sixties (Wait Until Dark, The Heart is a Lonely Hunter, Catch-22 (1970)) but for whatever reason he just never caught on with the masses. I’m so glad he finally won an Oscar but I wish he’d been nominated more in the sixties and seventies.

    I watched this again the other night too and I still find it enjoyable. I think it’s compared to It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World also because it’s one of the last of the “sixties” style comedies before the whole modern sense of comedy took over with works in the mold of Richard Lester (frenetic pacing), Mel Brooks (crude, off-color humor) and Woody Allen (one-liners, dialogue comedy). A combination of Lester and Brooks (fast-paced, very crude) still dominates comedy to this day.

    This movie really feels gentle and warm in comparison to what followed. It has a sense of ease with its subject and doesn’t make you squirm with awkward slapstick. And aside from Arkin, I agree that Brian Keith and Carl Reiner are very good indeed. But Arkin’s my favorite. What a talent he is.

    Thanks for great post, and so glad you have TCM now. I’ve had the opportunity to see so many movies again from childhood thanks to this channel and I’m glad now that you can too.

  4. cinebeats says; November 13, 2007 @ 10:34 am

    Thanks for the feedback Jonathan! I totally agree with you about Arkin. I’ve always liked him a lot too. A couple of his other best films are the wonderful but rarely seen Little Murders (1971) with Elliot Gould, which Arkin even directed. He really didn’t get enough praise for that terrific and funny film. I also like him in The In-Laws (1979) with Peter Falk a lot.

    I was happy that he won an Oscar too recently. He was really the only reason to watch Little Miss Sunshine since he was easily the best thing the movie (at least in my not so humble opinion).

    TCM has been terrific so far! I’m so glad I got to see Black Moon earlier (it might be my favorite Malle film now) and I’m really looking forward to watching the British comedy The Wrong Box soon. You can expect a review of it here after I do!

  5. Jonathan Lapper says; November 14, 2007 @ 6:42 am

    Well, since you brought up Little Miss Sunshine let me say just a couple of things about it. First, it’s fairly innocuous so I can’t say I have any intense like or dislike for it. And I thought everyone was very good in it although Arkin was my favorite. My problem with the movie was in the extraordinary convergence of catharses going on. In the course of one short road trip the father discovers his business plan/book is a failure and won’t happen, the brother-in-law sees the student he loved and almost killed himself over in a gas station on the highway and the son finds out he’s color-blind and can’t get into the Air Force because his little sister just happened upon a color blind test at the hospital. She happened upon a color blind test??!!!?!?! And all of these problems are compounded by the fact that the grandfather has died and is in the back of the van. It all just felt too clever, too convenient and too cliched. Had it passed by unnoticed except for Arkin I probably would’ve liked it better but given the praise heaped upon it I found myself at a loss to understand its appeal to critics. I fully understand its appeal with audiences. Again it’s innocuous enough that if people want to be mindlessly entertained for a couple of hours with cliched characters I accept that’s pretty much how it goes. But the critics, people whose careers require they see hundreds of films a year and thus become acutely aware of cliche, that I couldn’t understand. I walked into the movie under the distinct impression that I was going to be seeing something on par with the best Woody Allen observational character comedies. Ahem… it was not.

  6. cinebeats says; November 15, 2007 @ 11:06 am

    You may thought about the movie a little more than me Jonathan but thanks for sharing your thoughts on it. I just felt it was a predictable and rather dull dramedy that Hollywood/Sundance has been releasing on the public for years now. The whole story got on my nerves. Also, all the critical hype about the movie completely confused me… but it often does. If Arkin wasn’t in it I couldn’t have gotten through the movie, and by the time he left I was ready to stop watching the damn thing.

  7. Jeremy says; November 15, 2007 @ 4:32 pm

    I just watched this last night after burning it off TCM last week…
    I enjoyed it for the most part. I thought the first half was a bit stronger, as the second felt like it could have been tightened up a bit. I specifically felt like the last thirty minutes really drug on…
    Still, I liked the film and love many in the cast, including Arkin and Law.

    As for Little Miss Sunshine…I liked the film a bit more than you did but frankly couldn’t comprehend it getting a nomination for best picture. Parts of it don’t work at all, and it really tested my patience in the second half. I thought specifically the hospital sequence was incredibly stupid and overdone…that said, Arkin was fantastic in it…

    Oh, and I really dig Brian Dennehy as well and look forward to his programming…

  8. cinebeats says; November 16, 2007 @ 10:40 am

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts Jeremy! I’m glad you got the chance to watch this recently.

    I think my main problems with Little Miss Sunshine were the hype surrounding it when I saw it and the sentimentality just didn’t really work for me. Arkin was terrific though! I wish the film had been all about him.

  9. Victor says; May 5, 2008 @ 10:38 am

    As a russian viewer, I must say it’s one of the few movies where american actors speak russian rather good (maybe because of Mr.Arkin’s russian background). Usually russian language sounds awful even in contemporary movies - when everything is messed up.

    P.S. I found your blog just recently and I must say I’m really impressed - you’ve been doing a great job, thank you!


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>





Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Movie Posters 1960-1979

see more in Cinebeats' Flickr Gallery

CREDITS

  • Cinebeats chronicles one woman's love affair with '60s & '70s era cinema. Or as she likes to call it, cinema's Platinum Age! Blog design, updates and all original content is provided by Kimberly Lindbergs. She can be reached by email at:
    kimberly@cinebeats.com