<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modern Mondays: A History of Violence (2005)</title>
	<link>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kimberly Lindbergs</title>
		<link>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2787</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:32:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2787</guid>
					<description>Taylor - I haven't seen it. I'm afraid I have an aversion to Tom Hanks. Obviously I'm probably missing out on some worthwhile films.

Christianne - I think we're all in agreement that Wagner isn't a very good writer, but at least his ideas sparked a great screenplay and a terrific film.

And I'm totally with you in regard to critics and viewers who think Cronenberg has somehow &quot;softened&quot; up. That's just ridiculous. I really need to see Eastern Promises again but that film, along with History, easily contain some of Cronenberg's best moments. Unlike many other directors who seem to loose something as they grow older, Cronenberg just continues to become a more interesting filmmaker. I'm eager to see what he does next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Taylor - I haven&#8217;t seen it. I&#8217;m afraid I have an aversion to Tom Hanks. Obviously I&#8217;m probably missing out on some worthwhile films.</p>
	<p>Christianne - I think we&#8217;re all in agreement that Wagner isn&#8217;t a very good writer, but at least his ideas sparked a great screenplay and a terrific film.</p>
	<p>And I&#8217;m totally with you in regard to critics and viewers who think Cronenberg has somehow &#8220;softened&#8221; up. That&#8217;s just ridiculous. I really need to see Eastern Promises again but that film, along with History, easily contain some of Cronenberg&#8217;s best moments. Unlike many other directors who seem to loose something as they grow older, Cronenberg just continues to become a more interesting filmmaker. I&#8217;m eager to see what he does next.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christianne</title>
		<link>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2785</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:53:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2785</guid>
					<description>The graphic novel is very different from the film, and not nearly as good (I like Vince Locke, too, but I think the writing is pretty dire). 

I'm always amused at the people who claim that this film (and Eastern Promises, too) are departures for Cronenberg; to my mind it seems like this is exactly like his early horror movies. I think it's a weird kind of remake of Scanners, actually, with the younger brother confronting an older brother who wants to kill him, and with the victor coming out of the conflict with two elements of his persona--the meek and the agressive--fused together. Come to think of it, that's the plot of Dead Ringers, too. So it's pretty hard core Cronenberg.

It's my favorite Cronenberg of this decade, too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The graphic novel is very different from the film, and not nearly as good (I like Vince Locke, too, but I think the writing is pretty dire). </p>
	<p>I&#8217;m always amused at the people who claim that this film (and Eastern Promises, too) are departures for Cronenberg; to my mind it seems like this is exactly like his early horror movies. I think it&#8217;s a weird kind of remake of Scanners, actually, with the younger brother confronting an older brother who wants to kill him, and with the victor coming out of the conflict with two elements of his persona&#8211;the meek and the agressive&#8211;fused together. Come to think of it, that&#8217;s the plot of Dead Ringers, too. So it&#8217;s pretty hard core Cronenberg.</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s my favorite Cronenberg of this decade, too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Taylor Payne</title>
		<link>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2783</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:58:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2783</guid>
					<description>Another underrated comic-to-movie was 2002's Road to Perdition. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Another underrated comic-to-movie was 2002&#8217;s Road to Perdition.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kimberly Lindbergs</title>
		<link>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2770</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:33:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2770</guid>
					<description>It was definitely was one of the best films released in 2005 and I think it's probably my favorite recent Cronenberg film. I'm glad you like the Ballard review too! As for the differences between the film and comic, I have to agree with you, Brian. I think the original writer (John Wagner) only scratches at the surface of some of the ideas that Cronenberg really delves into with his film.

I do think the comic is worth a look though. I have mixed feelings about Wagner's writing in general, but I do love Vincent Locke's artwork and I think he's actually an under-appreciated comic book artist. Speaking of Locke, I wish someone would adapt the zombie tale he did with Stuart Kerr (Deadworld) into a film. I've heard rumors for years that a Deadworld movie was in the works but nothing has come of it yet. With the current interest in comic book tales, zombies and horror in general I suspect it would have a large audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It was definitely was one of the best films released in 2005 and I think it&#8217;s probably my favorite recent Cronenberg film. I&#8217;m glad you like the Ballard review too! As for the differences between the film and comic, I have to agree with you, Brian. I think the original writer (John Wagner) only scratches at the surface of some of the ideas that Cronenberg really delves into with his film.</p>
	<p>I do think the comic is worth a look though. I have mixed feelings about Wagner&#8217;s writing in general, but I do love Vincent Locke&#8217;s artwork and I think he&#8217;s actually an under-appreciated comic book artist. Speaking of Locke, I wish someone would adapt the zombie tale he did with Stuart Kerr (Deadworld) into a film. I&#8217;ve heard rumors for years that a Deadworld movie was in the works but nothing has come of it yet. With the current interest in comic book tales, zombies and horror in general I suspect it would have a large audience.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian</title>
		<link>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2769</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:53:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cinebeats.blogsome.com/2009/07/28/modern-mondays-a-history-of-violence-2005/#comment-2769</guid>
					<description>Love this film; put it atop my top ten list for 2005 at the time, and stand by that placement.  The Ballard review is the best one I've read of the film to date. Though it's worth pointing out that a good deal of what Ballard admires in the film is not really present in the original comic; the latter is an engrossing yarn but it doesn't really delve into issues of persona construction that are front and center of the film.

Great screencaps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Love this film; put it atop my top ten list for 2005 at the time, and stand by that placement.  The Ballard review is the best one I&#8217;ve read of the film to date. Though it&#8217;s worth pointing out that a good deal of what Ballard admires in the film is not really present in the original comic; the latter is an engrossing yarn but it doesn&#8217;t really delve into issues of persona construction that are front and center of the film.</p>
	<p>Great screencaps!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

