12 Comments »

  1. Brian says; August 25, 2009 @ 1:03 am

    Wish I had seen this one when it played the film festival; I don’t believe it ever got a release theatrically here in SF, but glad to learn it’s on DVD.

  2. Kimberly Lindbergs says; August 25, 2009 @ 1:18 am

    I wish I had seen it on the big screen, myself. I think it would be a really amazing theatrical experience.

    Hadzihalilovic is a fascinating director/producer and I’m really looking forward to her next film, Evolution. The write-ups I’ve read make it sound like it could be a similar film about youth, but told from the male perspective since it’s about young boys.

  3. Bob Turnbull says; August 25, 2009 @ 9:17 am

    It’s a beautiful film and you pointed out a few things (the sound field) that I didn’t latch onto the first time. It’s also one of the few films (short of “The Women”) where I don’t believe there is a single speking part for a male. You barely even see any males onscreen…

  4. Kimberly Lindbergs says; August 25, 2009 @ 10:29 am

    Bob - It’s also one of the few films (short of “The Women”) where I don’t believe there is a single speking part for a male.

    Very true! I wish I would have had more time to write about the film but I wanted to get this posted yesterday and it was kind of a rush job. It’s definitely one of the smartest and most interesting feminist films that I’ve seen in recent years.

  5. AR says; August 25, 2009 @ 11:18 am

    I saw a trailer for this a couple of months ago and decided I had to see it at some point. Good to hear positive commentary from someone whose opinion I respect.

    I haven’t seen any of Gaspar Noe’s work yet. Irreversible is another of those films I’d like to see at some point.

  6. Kimberly Lindbergs says; August 26, 2009 @ 12:52 am

    AR - I’d think you’d find the film really interesting! Noe seems to really divide critics, but I’m personally really fond of his work and I think he’s one of the most interesting directors making films right now.

    Lucile Hadzihalilovic has worked with Noe on most of his films as an editor, etc. but I think she’s really talented in her own right and I’m looking forward to seeing more of her work in the future.

  7. Peter Nellhaus says; August 26, 2009 @ 9:00 pm

    I was thinking I should add this film to my Netflix queue. Then I took some time to look and found that it’s been crawling up the queue for some time! Something to look forward to.

  8. Kimberly Lindbergs says; August 27, 2009 @ 5:53 am

    Peter - It’s a fascinating film but it seemed to divide many critics. I find the arguments calling it “child pornography” much more disturbing than the actual film. I’d love to hear what you think of it after you see it.

  9. Alexandra says; August 28, 2009 @ 9:19 am

    Glad to read some positive comments on this film! I saw it and loved it, but I could never understand the “child pornography” or “cinema of child exploitation” arguments that I read about it. (I likewise find them more disturbing than the actual film.)

    In addition to the use of sound, I was really astonished by the selective use of bright color against the muted backdrop of the natural world.

  10. Christianne says; August 29, 2009 @ 11:24 am

    I LOVED this film. It’s gorgeous, and it finds pressure points of unease more unerringly than the blunt instruments in all of Gaspar Noe’s film combined. It’s one of my favorite horror films of the aughts.

  11. Kimberly Lindbergs says; August 31, 2009 @ 7:28 am

    Alexandra - Your comments about the color are spot-on! I love the saturated look of the film at time combined with occasional bright splashes of color. It’s an amazing looking movie!

    Christianne - I’m glad you’re fond of the film too. I like Noe’s work a lot, but I do agree with you that this film is much more about creating a deep sense of unease within the audience. Noe like to take a jackhammer to his audience, but I think both approaches have their place. It’s definitely one of my favorite films of the decade as well!

  12. Phantom of Pulp says; October 13, 2009 @ 9:04 am

    I agree with all comments here. “Innocence” is an extraordinary film, and the use of natural sounds is inspired. I appreciate that it never attempts to explain or define its world. We define it for ourselves as viewers.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>





Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Movie Posters 1960-1979

see more in Cinebeats' Flickr Gallery








CREDITS

  • Cinebeats chronicles one woman's love affair with '60s & '70s era cinema. Or as she likes to call it, cinema's Platinum Age! Blog design, updates and all original content is provided by Kimberly Lindbergs. She can be reached by email at:
    kimberly@cinebeats.com. This site is a review site and claims no ownership over the images used to promote the films reviewed here. All original blog content is copyright © by Kimberly Lindbergs and can not be directly copied or distributed in full without her permission.